
We treat the ether as a magnetoelectric medium with field-responsive parameters μ(x,t) and ε(x,t). The constitutive relations and (slightly generalized) Maxwell system are
D = ε(x,t) E,
B = μ(x,t) H,
∇×E = − {∂B/∂t} − Jm,
∇×H = {∂D/∂t} + Je,
∇⋅D = ρe,
∇⋅B = ρm,
where ρm and Jm are infinitesimal monopole charge/current densities (curl reservoir). In charge-free radiation zones we use ρe ≈ 0, Je ≈ 0, with ρm, Jm retained only as regulators that allow finite curl storage.
The local light speed and impedance are
c(x,t) = 1/sqrt{με}, Z(x,t) = sqrt{μ/ε}.
It follows that
ln c = −1/2 ln (με),
ln Z = 1/2 ln μ − 1/2lnε.
The instantaneous energy densities and Poynting vector are
uE = 1/2 {ε ∣E∣^2},
uB = 1/2 {∣B∣^2}/μ,
S = E×H.
With variable μ, ε, the power balance becomes
∂/∂t(uE + uB) + ∇⋅S = − 1/2 ∣E∣^2 {∂ε/∂t} (electric storage), − 1/2 ∣B∣^2 {∂/∂t} (1/μ) (magnetic storage) − E⋅Je − H⋅Jm.
The right-hand terms quantify exchange with the ether (curl reservoir). In radiation zones (Je ≈ 0) the two explicit storage terms govern the kinetic ↔ potential energy choreography that underpins inertia and “gravitational” delay.
Energy partition:
E total = E kinetic + E potential,
ΔEpotential ∝ ∫ (1/2∣E∣^2 dε+1/2∣B∣^2 d(1/μ)).
The instantaneous energy densities and Poynting vector are
uE = 1/2 ε ∣E∣^2,
uB = 1/2 ∣B∣^2/μ,
S = E × H.
With variable μ,ε, the power balance becomes
∂/∂t(uE + uB) + ∇⋅S = − 1/2 ∣E∣^2 {∂ε/∂t} (electric storage) − 1/2 ∣B∣^2 {∂/∂t (1/μ)} (magnetic storage) − E⋅Je − H⋅Jm.
The right-hand terms quantify exchange with the ether (curl reservoir). In radiation zones (Je ≈ 0) the two explicit storage terms govern the kinetic ↔ potential energy choreography that underpins inertia and “gravitational” delay.
Energy partition:
E total = E kinetic + E potential,
ΔE potential ∝ ∫ (1/2∣E∣^2 dε + 1/2∣B∣^2 d(1/μ)).
Define the refractive index
n(x) = c0/c(x) = c0 sqrt με,
where c0 is the measured vacuum speed near equilibrium. Fermat’s principle yields the ray equations
d/ds (n k^) = ∇n,
dx/ds = k^,
with k^ the unit tangent and s arclength. In terms of c,
dk^/ds = − ∇ ln c + (k^⋅∇ ln c)k^.
Thus rays deflect toward decreasing c (increasing n), i.e., toward higher με—our “impedance gravity.” No spacetime curvature is required; bending is geometric optics in a graded medium.
An effective potential convenient for comparisons:
ΦZ(x) ≡ c0^2 ln n(x) = − c0^2 ln {c(x)/c0}.
Then the ray acceleration obeys
d^2x/ds^2 ≈ − ∇ (ΦZ/c0^2),
and for massive charges (see §8.6) an analogous force law appears with appropriate coupling.
Define the impedance curvature tensor and scalar:
Kij ≡ ∂i∂j ln Z,
K ≡ ∇^2 ln Z.
We postulate the macroscopic field equation
∇^2 ln Z ∝ E ≡ ⟨ uE + uB⟩,
i.e., impedance curvature tracks coarse-grained energy density. This is the μ–ε analog of ∇^2 Φ ∝ ρ in Newtonian gravity and mirrors GR’s Gμν ∝ Tμνat the level of averages (cf. §7.1).
Because Z = sqrt {μ/ε} and c = 1/sqrt {με} , gradients in ln Z and ln c separate magnetic–electric asymmetry from speed:
∇ ln Z = 1/2 ∇ ln μ − 1/2 ∇ ln ε,
∇ ln c = −1/2 ∇ ln μ −1/2 ∇ ln ε.
Curl amplification increases ∣∇ ln Z∣| (asymmetry) while generally lowering c (delay).
Let a charge q with velocity v move through a rotating impedance field. Define an impedance rotation (vorticity) vector
ΩZ ≡ 1/2 ∇ × (∇ ln Z × v^),
evaluated along the trajectory. The leading transverse (Coriolis-like) force is
F⊥ ≈ qeff v × ΩZ,
qeff = αZ q,
where αZ is a dimensionless coupling that captures how strongly the ether’s impedance vorticity interacts with the charge’s EM structure. Opposite charges spiral oppositely (bubble-chamber helices), consistent with your observation.
A complementary longitudinal drag/boost from graded c is
F∥ ≈ − γZ m v (v^⋅∇ ln c),
with γZ > 0. When a leading high-energy particle reduces c behind it (imprinting μ, ε wake), followers can be accelerated (−∇ ln c points forward), realizing the ether accelerator mechanism.
Introduce the product field
Π(x, t) ≡ μ(x, t) ε(x, t )= 1/c^2.
Gravitational strength is governed by gradients of Π\PiΠ. The saturation hypothesis states that there exists Πmax such that
∂Π/∂ρ → 0 as energy density ρ → ρ⋆,
implying
∇Π → 0 ⇒ ∇ ln c → 0,
so gravitational forcing weakens at extreme density—your “high mass, low gravity” result. The medium stiffens; further energy adds volume or internal modes, not deeper gradients.
The energy-equilibrium sheet (equal electric and magnetic participation) satisfies
uE = uB ⟺ μ = ε/c^2(local).
On this sheet the impedance ratio and speed co-determine a balanced propagation state; departures from the sheet quantify asymmetry and potential curl storage (mass tendency). Let
Δasym ≡ ln (μc^2/ε) = 2 ln Z + ln (c^2),
so Δasym = 0 on the sheet and grows sinusoidally with curl amplitude in your model (Cauchy-type dispersion).
dk^/ds = − ∇ ln c + (k^ ⋅ ∇ ln c) k^.
2. Red/blue shift from impedance evolution along a path C:
Δλ/λ ≈ ∫C dℓ k^ ⋅ ∇ ln n = ∫C dℓ k^ ⋅ ∇(1/2 ln με).
3. Local power exchange (radiation ↔ curl):
W ether = 1/2 ∣E∣^2 ε˙ + 1/2 ∣B∣^2 d/dt (1/μ),
sign determines absorption vs release.
4. Impedance curvature–energy relation (coarse-grained):
∇^2 ln Z = β⟨uE+uB⟩,
with β a universal coupling (to be measured).
5. Saturation scaling (extreme density):
∣∇ ln c∣ ∝ ((1−Π)/Πmax)^p, p>0,
predicts weakening gravity near Πmax.
From μ ∈[0.6, 2.0]×10^−6 H/m, ε∈[4,13]×10−12 F/m:
cmin ≈ 1.96×10^8 m/s,
ceq ≈ 3.01×10^8 m/s,
cmax ≈ 6.46×10^8 m/s.
At fixed frequency f, λ=c/f sets the wavelength ladder; at f ≈ 5×10^14 Hz: λeq ≈ 602 nm, λmax ≈ 1290 nm.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.