IRTP Institute
IRTP Institute
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Question Current Physics
    • Alexander Unzicker, PhD
    • D Larson, PhD in Physics
    • Hossenfelder, PhD Physics
    • Hossenfelder Controversy
    • Sam Altman go to 27:50
  • Interesting Videos
  • Page 0
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • More
    • Home
    • Introduction
    • Question Current Physics
      • Alexander Unzicker, PhD
      • D Larson, PhD in Physics
      • Hossenfelder, PhD Physics
      • Hossenfelder Controversy
      • Sam Altman go to 27:50
    • Interesting Videos
    • Page 0
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Question Current Physics
    • Alexander Unzicker, PhD
    • D Larson, PhD in Physics
    • Hossenfelder, PhD Physics
    • Hossenfelder Controversy
    • Sam Altman go to 27:50
  • Interesting Videos
  • Page 0
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9

Preliminary Paper

The μ–ε Continuum: Energy Balance and Variable Light Speed

8. Mathematical Development

8.1 Variable-Coefficient Maxwell System

 

We treat the ether as a magnetoelectric medium with field-responsive parameters μ(x,t) and ε(x,t). The constitutive relations and (slightly generalized) Maxwell system are


D = ε(x,t) E, 

B = μ(x,t) H,

 ∇×E = − {∂B/∂t} − Jm,

∇×H = {∂D/∂t} + Je,

∇⋅D = ρe,

∇⋅B = ρm,


where ρm and Jm​ are infinitesimal monopole charge/current densities (curl reservoir). In charge-free radiation zones we use ρe ⁣≈ ⁣0, Je ⁣≈ ⁣0, with ρm, Jm retained only as regulators that allow finite curl storage.


The local light speed and impedance are


c(x,t) = 1/sqrt{με}, Z(x,t) = sqrt{μ/ε}.


It follows that


ln⁡ c = −1/2 ln ⁡(με),

ln⁡ Z = 1/2 ln⁡ μ − 1/2ln⁡ε.  

8.2 Variable-Medium Wave Equations

 

The instantaneous energy densities and Poynting vector are


uE = 1/2 {ε ∣E∣^2},

uB = 1/2 {∣B∣^2}/μ,                                         

S = E×H.


With variable μ, ε, the power balance becomes


∂/∂t(uE + uB) + ∇⋅S = − 1/2 ∣E∣^2 {∂ε/∂t} (electric storage),  − 1/2 ∣B∣^2 {∂/∂t} ⁣(1/μ) (magnetic storage) − E⋅Je − H⋅Jm.

 

The right-hand terms quantify exchange with the ether (curl reservoir). In radiation zones (Je ⁣≈ ⁣0) the two explicit storage terms govern the kinetic ↔ potential energy choreography that underpins inertia and “gravitational” delay.


Energy partition:


E  total = E kinetic + E  potential,

ΔEpotential ∝ ∫ ⁣(1/2∣E∣^2 dε+1/2∣B∣^2 d(1/μ)). 

8.3 Energy Densities and Generalized Poynting Theorem

 

The instantaneous energy densities and Poynting vector are


uE = 1/2 ε ∣E∣^2,

uB =  1/2 ∣B∣^2/μ,

S = E × H.


With variable μ,ε, the power balance becomes


∂/∂t(uE + uB) + ∇⋅S = − 1/2 ∣E∣^2 {∂ε/∂t} (electric storage) − 1/2 ∣B∣^2 {∂/∂t ⁣(1/μ)} (magnetic storage) − E⋅Je − H⋅Jm.


The right-hand terms quantify exchange with the ether (curl reservoir). In radiation zones (Je ⁣≈ ⁣0) the two explicit storage terms govern the kinetic ↔ potential energy choreography that underpins inertia and “gravitational” delay.


Energy partition:


E total = E  kinetic + E potential,

ΔE  potential ∝ ∫ ⁣(1/2∣E∣^2 dε + 1/2∣B∣^2  d(1/μ)). 

8.4 Rays, Refractive Index, and “Gravitational” Bending

 

Define the refractive index


n(x) = c0/c(x) = c0 sqrt με, 


where c0​ is the measured vacuum speed near equilibrium. Fermat’s principle yields the ray equations

d/ds ⁣(n k^) = ∇n,

dx/ds = k^,

 

with k^ the unit tangent and s arclength. In terms of c,


dk^/ds = − ∇ ln ⁡c + (k^⋅∇ ln ⁡c)k^.


Thus rays deflect toward decreasing c (increasing n), i.e., toward higher με—our “impedance gravity.” No spacetime curvature is required; bending is geometric optics in a graded medium.


An effective potential convenient for comparisons:


ΦZ(x) ≡ c0^2 ln ⁡n(x) = − c0^2 ln⁡ ⁣{c(x)/c0}.


Then the ray acceleration obeys


d^2x/ds^2 ≈  − ∇ ⁣(ΦZ/c0^2),

 

and for massive charges (see §8.6) an analogous force law appears with appropriate coupling.

8.5 Impedance Curvature (Gravitational Analog)

 

 

Define the impedance curvature tensor and scalar:


Kij ≡ ∂i∂j ln⁡ Z,

K ≡ ∇^2 ln⁡ Z.


We postulate the macroscopic field equation


∇^2 ln ⁡Z  ∝  E ≡ ⟨ uE + uB⟩,


i.e., impedance curvature tracks coarse-grained energy density. This is the μ–ε analog of ∇^2 Φ ∝ ρ in Newtonian gravity and mirrors GR’s Gμν ∝ Tμνat the level of averages (cf. §7.1).


Because Z = sqrt {μ/ε}​ and c = 1/sqrt {με} ​, gradients in ln ⁡Z and ln⁡ c separate magnetic–electric asymmetry from speed:


∇ ln ⁡Z = 1/2 ∇ ln⁡ μ − 1/2 ∇ ln⁡ ε,

∇ ln ⁡c = −1/2 ∇ ln ⁡μ −1/2 ∇ ln⁡ ε.


Curl amplification increases ∣∇ ln Z∣| (asymmetry) while generally lowering c (delay).

8.6 Charged-Particle Dynamics and Coriolis-Like Term

 

Let a charge q with velocity v move through a rotating impedance field. Define an impedance rotation (vorticity) vector


ΩZ ≡ 1/2 ∇ × (∇ ln ⁡Z × v^),


evaluated along the trajectory. The leading transverse (Coriolis-like) force is

F⊥ ≈ qeff  v × ΩZ, 

qeff = αZ q,


where αZ​ is a dimensionless coupling that captures how strongly the ether’s  impedance vorticity interacts with the charge’s EM structure. Opposite charges spiral oppositely (bubble-chamber helices), consistent with your observation.


A complementary longitudinal drag/boost from graded c is


F∥ ≈ − γZ m v (v^⋅∇ ln ⁡c),

 

with γZ > 0. When a leading high-energy particle reduces c behind it (imprinting μ, ε  wake), followers can be accelerated (−∇ ln ⁡c points forward), realizing the ether accelerator mechanism.

8.7 Energy Balance, Saturation, and Weak Gravity at High Density

 

Introduce the product field


Π(x, t) ≡ μ(x, t) ε(x, t )= 1/c^2.

 

Gravitational strength is governed by gradients of Π\PiΠ. The saturation hypothesis states that there exists Πmax⁡​ such that

∂Π/∂ρ → 0 as energy density ρ → ρ⋆,

 

implying


∇Π → 0 ⇒ ∇ ln⁡ c → 0,


so gravitational forcing weakens at extreme density—your “high mass, low gravity” result. The medium stiffens; further energy adds volume or internal modes, not deeper gradients.

8.8 Energy-Balance Line (Equal Participation)

 

The energy-equilibrium sheet (equal electric and magnetic participation) satisfies


uE = uB ⟺ μ = ε/c^2(local).

 

On this sheet the impedance ratio and speed co-determine a balanced propagation state; departures from the sheet quantify asymmetry and potential curl storage (mass tendency). Let


Δasym ≡ ln⁡ ⁣(μc^2/ε) = 2 ln⁡ Z + ln⁡ (c^2), 


so Δasym = 0 on the sheet and grows sinusoidally with curl amplitude in your model (Cauchy-type dispersion).

8.9 Testable Relations and Scaling Laws

 

  1. Bending law (ray):
     

dk^/ds = − ∇ ln ⁡c + (k^ ⁣⋅ ⁣∇ ln ⁡c) k^.


         2.  Red/blue shift from impedance evolution along a path C:


Δλ/λ ≈ ∫C ⁣ dℓ k^ ⋅ ∇ ln ⁡n = ∫C  ⁣dℓ k^ ⋅ ∇(1/2 ln⁡ με).


        3.  Local power exchange (radiation ↔ curl):
 

W ether = 1/2 ∣E∣^2 ε˙ + 1/2 ∣B∣^2 d/dt ⁣(1/μ), 


sign determines absorption vs release.


        4.  Impedance curvature–energy relation (coarse-grained):
 

∇^2 ln ⁡Z = β⟨uE​+uB​⟩,  


 with β a universal coupling (to be measured).


       5.  Saturation scaling (extreme density):
 

∣∇ ln⁡ c∣ ∝ ((1−Π)/Πmax⁡)^p, p>0,

 

predicts weakening gravity near Πmax.

8.10 Bounds and Equilibrium Values

 

From μ ∈[0.6, 2.0]×10^−6 H/m, ε∈[4,13]×10−12 F/m:


cmin⁡ ≈ 1.96×10^8 m/s, 

ceq ≈ 3.01×10^8 m/s, 

cmax⁡ ≈ 6.46×10^8 m/s.


At fixed frequency f, λ=c/f sets the wavelength ladder; at f ⁣≈ ⁣5×10^14 Hz: λeq ⁣≈ ⁣602 nm, λmax⁡ ⁣≈ ⁣1290 nm.

8.11 Summary (Mathematical Core)

  • Medium: μ(x,t), ε(x,t) define c = 1/sqrt (με​), Z=sqrt (μ/ε)
     
  • Gravity analog: gradients of ln ⁡c (speed) and ln⁡ Z (asymmetry) steer rays and charges.
     
  • Curvature: K = ∇^2 ln⁡ Z tracks coarse energy density.
     
  • Exchange: generalized Poynting theorem adds ε˙ and d/dt(1/μ)  coupling—radiation ↔ curl.
     
  • Saturation: Π = με approaches Πmax ⁡⇒ ∣∇ ln ⁡c∣ → 0 ⇒ weak gravity at extreme density.
     
  • Energy balance sheet: μ=ε/c^2 defines equilibrium propagation.

Copyright © 2025 IRTP Institute - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Sam Altman go to 27:50
  • Interesting Videos
  • Page 0
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept